Search results

First better show a screenshot of at least 1 of the above mine to see the whole situation. And also get some numbers/scores on a couple of graphics/games benchmarks so to have a base line of current system performance. Yes the XMP/DOCP profile can be on by just enabling it in BIOS

Very few boards have settings about this. I know some AsRock have. My Gigabyte X570 does not. But dont sweat on it. The 112% PRD means that what you see for PPT is in reality less than ~90W consumption 90 / 1.12 = 80W As this is a 5700X3D CPU with lower clocks than the nonX3D part I would...

Nothing to worry about... its just false CPU reporting. These are not actual high temps. The CPU will shut down by itself long before it reached 120+C. They have safeties you know... In your adrenalin drivers, do you have AMD metrics on? If yes try to disabled them all before you uninstall them...

You might want to see these. Very informative videos Additionally maybe save off some power consumption for example set the limit from 253W down to 200W It will help with temps Its on a Gigabyte board but with some research you could find the equivalent settings on yours

Whats your cooling for the CPU? And Its power consumption (watt) is very high I can understand if you run all core loads to get 250W as this is its configured max power limit (253W). But on gaming to exceed 200W is totally wrong IMO. On the other hand I do not have personal experience with Intel...

I have a 5900X and had those double readings exactly as you are having (CPU temps and some frequencies). Nothing to worry about, its just false CPU reporting. Currently I have (still) the 8.03-5455 version of HWiNFO and those x2 readings never showed up again. I do have the latest chipset...

Not exactly... Its 62W (PPT) divided by 0.55 62 / 0.55 = 112.7W If I'm not mistaken the default PPT for 5700X is 76W In a perfect world PPT should read 76W and PRD 100% So... 76 / 1 = 76W

By OC if you mean PBO and curve optimizer, no it does not dissapear. And I can see it on your screenshot. If you want people here to see if anything is going on with your setup you have to show a screenshot while you run the benchmark. Prime95 of cinebench If the reported power (PPT) is below...

There can be a lot going wrong for such a temperature. Ryzen 7000series have max operating temp at 90C. You should stop stressing your PC until you find what's going on or you might damage your CPU permanently. @Martin means the block mount retention mechanism on the CPU socket. You might not...

Did you read the description of PowerReportingDeviation sensor?

Also you can enable "Show ToolTips" from sensors window settings so when you hover the pointer over a sensor will give you a general description. Example of tooltip This (external switch) maybe is related to VRMs

GPU? Discrete or OnBoard? Look at the "APU STAPM Limit" between your 2 screenshots. On 1st ss its over limit (115%) and on 2nd its 90% https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/threads/difference-between-cpu-package-power-and-apu-stapm.6921/ Also on both SS the "PPT Slow Limit" is right on 100% but "PPT...

According to AMD 7945HX specs this is a default 55W TDP with adjustability up to 75W. This means that actual power consumption (PPT) may well exceed 100W and we see it on those screenshots (~120W) Given that is a mobile CPU installed on laptops I believe its too aggressively tuned unless there...

You should try the latest beta version of HWiNFO64

Did a test gaming session... I saw the same. At least for my FCLK/MCLK/UCLK max speed readings, all was peaked at +6.67% from actual settings (1800MHz >> 1920MHz) HWiNFO v8.02-5440

Can we see a whole window of HWiNFO sensors please? That 7% seems a little weird.

AMD reference 5700 nonXT has an official total power of 180W. Boost clock (GPU) up to 1725MHz. I expect maybe some AIB cards to go as far as ~200W. That 180W is for the entire card. So GPU power alone (excluding, memory, fans, etc..) sould be less than 180W. "GPU PPT Limit" is referring to GPU...

You have a lot more double values than that 150C temp. I can identify at least 9 more

Usually board vendors want to show to the market (consumers) that their board can run the CPU to the highest performance possible, as being the best on the market. At least this is what’s happening with intel platform(s). I seriously doubt that that’s the case with Ryzen CPUs. After all the...

Please read post #560